Johnson & Johnson proposes $5.5 billion talc settlement to end marathon legal fight - AP News
What the report says
The Associated Press reported that Johnson & Johnson has proposed a $5.5 billion settlement aimed at resolving remaining lawsuits alleging that its talc products caused ovarian cancer. The New Brunswick, New Jersey-based company said the deal depends on participation by at least 95% of remaining claimants, a threshold that would be crucial to ending the long-running litigation.
The proposal follows a setback last year for Red River Talc, a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, when a U.S. bankruptcy judge rejected a separate $9 billion settlement plan that AP described as potentially among the largest mass-tort resolutions in history. Johnson & Johnson did not appeal that ruling and continued contesting claims in court. AP also reported that a federal judge recently directed plaintiffs to explain why pending talc cases should not be dismissed after their witnesses were unable to establish a direct causal link between the company’s product and cancer.
Under the new plan, Johnson & Johnson would make an initial payment capped at $3 billion next year, with no further payments due until 2028. Erik Haas, the company’s worldwide vice president of litigation, said in a statement that the court order left plaintiffs needing specific causation evidence and that the settlement would let the company move on, while maintaining that Johnson & Johnson believed it would have prevailed in continued litigation.
AP noted that Johnson & Johnson says it has already resolved about 95% of filed mesothelioma lawsuits, all state consumer protection claims and talc-supplier disputes. The settlement matters because it could significantly narrow one of the most prominent product-liability fights facing a major health care company, though it remains contingent on claimant participation and any necessary court processes.
Loading debate for this article…
Other publishers covering this story
No additional verified coverage is currently clustered with this report.

How Netanyahu Used Fear, Again, to Win More Votes Than Anyone ElseNew York Times World
With No Clear Winner, How Could Israel Get a Prime Minister?New York Times World
Why Michigan could decide the future of Trump’s presidencyAl Jazeera
Nigeria: FEC Approves System to Coordinate Humanitarian Aid, Poverty ReductionAllAfrica