256 Newsroom — Uganda's Digital News Infrastructure
World

Will UNESCO’s heritage listing halt Israeli plans for West Bank’s Sebastia?

Share
Will UNESCO’s heritage listing halt Israeli plans for West Bank’s Sebastia?
Image · Al Jazeera

What the report says

Al Jazeera reports that Palestinian officials welcomed UNESCO’s decision to place Sebastia, an ancient site in the occupied West Bank, on both the World Heritage List and the List of World Heritage in Danger. The move was described by Palestinian representatives as a possible safeguard against Israeli efforts to extend control over the village and its archaeological area. Israel rejected the UNESCO action, calling it political.

Sebastia, near a Palestinian village of the same name, is described as a site with more than 3,000 years of history, including remains associated with Samaria, Roman-era Sebaste, and later Byzantine, Islamic, Crusader and Ottoman periods. The area includes Roman columns, ancient walls, steps and an amphitheatre, and local residents depend in part on tourism linked to the site.

According to Al Jazeera, Israeli authorities have announced plans to seize about 180 hectares, or 445 acres, in and around the archaeological zone, saying the purpose is preservation and development. Palestinian officials say the measure threatens livelihoods and the cultural character of the area. They also warn that a proposed Israeli bill could expand Israeli authority over West Bank archaeological sites, reducing the Palestinian Authority’s role in areas where it has limited administrative control under the Oslo accords.

Palestinian Tourism and Antiquities Minister Hani al-Hayek said UNESCO recognized Sebastia’s layered historical significance and placed it on the danger list because of threats tied to Israeli occupation, including land confiscation plans and limits on conservation work. Al Jazeera notes that UNESCO listing does not by itself compel Israel to change policy, citing previous disputes over Hebron and East Jerusalem.

Read the full report at Al Jazeera →

Loading debate for this article…

Other publishers covering this story

No additional verified coverage is currently clustered with this report.

Related reporting