Uganda’s future must not be negotiated behind closed doors

What the report says

The Observer says a new proposal for Uganda’s political future is reopening debate over how the country should prepare for a post-Museveni era. The piece focuses on Gen Salim Saleh and Prof Ogenga Otunnu, who have produced a 128-page document calling for a national political settlement to address sectarianism, political exclusion, regional inequality and other long-running grievances.

According to the commentary, the central issue is whether a political establishment that has dominated Uganda for about four decades can credibly lead reforms that would limit its own power. The article argues that private understandings among senior figures are not enough, and that any serious national dialogue should be public, inclusive and built on institutions rather than personal deals. It notes that the document itself acknowledges weaknesses in elections, institutions and education, while also warning that such admissions do not replace concrete reform.

The piece also reflects opposition scepticism about the initiative, including questions over who gave Saleh the authority to lead it and whether it is tied to succession politics. At the same time, it says dialogue should not be dismissed simply because it involves members of the ruling elite. The author urges a transparent consultation process involving opposition parties, civil society, religious leaders, youth and marginalized communities, with parliament oversight and measurable commitments. The broader significance, the article says, is that Uganda’s future depends on stronger institutions, not just a managed transfer of power.