#OutToLunch: Should parents give away their wealth when they are still alive?

What the report says

Watchdog Uganda published an opinion piece by Denis Jjuuko reacting to a wave of social-media videos and online discussions about inheritance, wills and family conflict over property. The post says the debate was prompted by a son accusing his late father’s widow of causing the man’s death by blocking treatment or approving an operation he would not survive, an allegation the article links to the family’s wealth and status. Jjuuko uses the episode to argue that disputes over estates are common and can become bitter, especially when wealthy families delay planning for succession.

The column also refers to other Ugandan examples, including a case in which a child reportedly took a father to court in an effort to be named successor while the parent was still alive. More broadly, the writer says many families see conflict over property, with some children allegedly forging wills, occupying homes, or evicting relatives. He notes that the renewed attention has encouraged some people to start drafting wills and has prompted legal commentary online.

Jjuuko suggests that wealthy parents should think carefully about how to prevent future disputes. He mentions trusts as one possible tool, while also saying the simpler option may be to transfer assets while still alive. The article frames the issue as both a legal and family concern, and says the debate reflects wider anxieties about succession, especially where large estates are involved.