Lamenting torture is not enough. Uganda must end it

What the report says

The Observer’s editorial argues that President Yoweri Museveni’s recent condemnation of torture as “immoral” and inconsistent with the aims of the National Resistance Movement is important, but not enough on its own. The piece says the statement reflects a long-standing concern among Ugandans, and it links that concern to repeated allegations of abuse by members of the security forces.

The article places Museveni’s remarks in the context of wider criticism from human rights bodies. It cites a recent warning from the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights about weakening rule of law, increased military involvement in civilian affairs, and reduced civic space. It also refers to findings from the Uganda Human Rights Commission, which the paper says recorded many complaints involving unlawful detention and other liberty violations.

While noting that specific allegations, including those involving Stephen Nuwagaba, should be properly investigated, the editorial says the larger issue is institutional accountability. It argues that Uganda cannot reject torture in principle while allowing allegations to accumulate without transparent action, and that oversight bodies, courts and security agencies must work independently and effectively.

The Observer concludes that ending torture requires more than presidential criticism. It calls for credible investigations, prosecutions where warranted, protection for victims and witnesses, and stronger safeguards for anyone in custody. The broader point, the piece says, is that torture weakens public trust and the legitimacy of the state itself.