FIFA World Cup: Five key takeaways from 2026 edition won by Spain

What the report says

Al Jazeera reported that Spain won the 2026 FIFA World Cup after defeating Argentina in the final, closing what it described as the largest edition of the tournament. In a July 20 analysis, Kevin Hand wrote that the competition ultimately shifted toward footballing issues, though its opening was overshadowed by politics involving co-host the United States, Iran, visa difficulties and a ceasefire that preceded the tournament.

A central takeaway was the expansion to 48 teams. Al Jazeera said fears about too many matches and lower quality were eased by competitive performances from debutants and smaller nations, citing Cape Verde’s draws with Spain and Uruguay and its extra-time defeat to Argentina. The article noted that discussion has already moved to a possible 64-team format in 2030, which could keep the finalists’ workload unchanged if structured around 16 groups feeding into a last-32 knockout stage.

The report also highlighted concerns over hydration breaks, which drew boos from stadium crowds because they interrupted play. Al Jazeera said scientists, coaches and FIFA may still defend such stoppages at summer tournaments because of heat risks, while noting there are no plans cited for similar breaks in most domestic leagues.

Other issues included FIFA’s handling of a red card to United States forward Folarin Balogun, whose suspension was put on probation after President Donald Trump urged FIFA president Gianni Infantino to review the case, according to Al Jazeera. The article said the decision drew criticism before the US exited in the next round. It also argued that officials should address tactical fouling and other so-called “dark arts” after Argentina’s semifinal and final performances raised questions about early challenges and referee control.